header-logo header-logo

Firms warned on dirty money

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A review of money-laundering compliance at 59 law firms has resulted in 26 firms being referred to Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary processes.

The SRA issued a stern warning this week that it will take ‘strong action’ against firms with inadequate procedures in place, after its review revealed a ‘significant minority’ were not doing enough to meet their obligations under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2016/692).

The firms were chosen because they create and administer trusts and companies on behalf of clients, a high-risk area for exploitation by criminals.

Poor risk assessment procedures were uncovered at 24 firms, including four firms with no risk assessment procedures in place at all. Inadequate customer due diligence was found at 14 firms.

Only ten firms had submitted suspicious activity reports (SARs) in the past two years. The SRA notes this tallies with concerns raised by the National Crime Agency that generally law firms are not being proactive enough in looking to identify and then report suspicious activity.

The review found no evidence of actual money laundering or intent to become involved in criminal activities.

The SRA has now launched a second review, of 400 law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, warned: ‘Too many firms are falling short.

‘Those firms should be on notice that compliance is not optional. They need to improve swiftly. Where we have serious concerns that a firm could be enabling money laundering, we will take strong action.’

John Binns, partner at BCL Solicitors, said HMRC fines for non-compliance with money laundering regulations rose by more than 90% in 12 months last year as ‘part of an increasingly hostile environment’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll