header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Firms warned on dirty money

A review of money-laundering compliance at 59 law firms has resulted in 26 firms being referred to Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary processes.

The SRA issued a stern warning this week that it will take ‘strong action’ against firms with inadequate procedures in place, after its review revealed a ‘significant minority’ were not doing enough to meet their obligations under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2016/692).

The firms were chosen because they create and administer trusts and companies on behalf of clients, a high-risk area for exploitation by criminals.

Poor risk assessment procedures were uncovered at 24 firms, including four firms with no risk assessment procedures in place at all. Inadequate customer due diligence was found at 14 firms.

Only ten firms had submitted suspicious activity reports (SARs) in the past two years. The SRA notes this tallies with concerns raised by the National Crime Agency that generally law firms are not being proactive enough in looking to identify and then report suspicious activity.

The review found no evidence of actual money laundering or intent to become involved in criminal activities.

The SRA has now launched a second review, of 400 law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, warned: ‘Too many firms are falling short.

‘Those firms should be on notice that compliance is not optional. They need to improve swiftly. Where we have serious concerns that a firm could be enabling money laundering, we will take strong action.’

John Binns, partner at BCL Solicitors, said HMRC fines for non-compliance with money laundering regulations rose by more than 90% in 12 months last year as ‘part of an increasingly hostile environment’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll