header-logo header-logo

Firms warned on dirty money

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

A review of money-laundering compliance at 59 law firms has resulted in 26 firms being referred to Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary processes.

The SRA issued a stern warning this week that it will take ‘strong action’ against firms with inadequate procedures in place, after its review revealed a ‘significant minority’ were not doing enough to meet their obligations under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2016/692).

The firms were chosen because they create and administer trusts and companies on behalf of clients, a high-risk area for exploitation by criminals.

Poor risk assessment procedures were uncovered at 24 firms, including four firms with no risk assessment procedures in place at all. Inadequate customer due diligence was found at 14 firms.

Only ten firms had submitted suspicious activity reports (SARs) in the past two years. The SRA notes this tallies with concerns raised by the National Crime Agency that generally law firms are not being proactive enough in looking to identify and then report suspicious activity.

The review found no evidence of actual money laundering or intent to become involved in criminal activities.

The SRA has now launched a second review, of 400 law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, warned: ‘Too many firms are falling short.

‘Those firms should be on notice that compliance is not optional. They need to improve swiftly. Where we have serious concerns that a firm could be enabling money laundering, we will take strong action.’

John Binns, partner at BCL Solicitors, said HMRC fines for non-compliance with money laundering regulations rose by more than 90% in 12 months last year as ‘part of an increasingly hostile environment’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll