header-logo header-logo

23 October 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’

Personal injury firms may be pointing their marketing efforts at the wrong targets, according to research by legal marketing collective First4Lawyers

More than two-thirds of solicitors polled by the organisation believed clients shopped around before choosing a lawyer. However, the reality is only one quarter do this, which means first impressions are important.

Law firms also tend to make marketing decisions on gut instinct or anecdote rather than hard facts, the research showed, and only half of personal injury firms surveyed analysed the performance of their marketing in the previous quarter or year when making spending decisions.

First4Lawyers’ research also found solicitors overestimate how impressed clients are by recommendations from family and friends, local offices and a quality mark, while underestimating the significance to clients of online searches.

Qamar Anwar, First4Lawyers’ managing director, said clients considered online searches ‘the best-quality enquiry out there.

‘Our own statistics show that a contact that’s come from search engine marketing activity is more likely to convert into a live lead than from any other form of marketing.’

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40% of firms have cut their marketing budget and 19% have made marketing staff redundant. A bullish 17% of firms, however, have increased their marketing spend instead.

The results of the research are contained in First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
back-to-top-scroll