header-logo header-logo

First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’

23 October 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
Personal injury firms may be pointing their marketing efforts at the wrong targets, according to research by legal marketing collective First4Lawyers

More than two-thirds of solicitors polled by the organisation believed clients shopped around before choosing a lawyer. However, the reality is only one quarter do this, which means first impressions are important.

Law firms also tend to make marketing decisions on gut instinct or anecdote rather than hard facts, the research showed, and only half of personal injury firms surveyed analysed the performance of their marketing in the previous quarter or year when making spending decisions.

First4Lawyers’ research also found solicitors overestimate how impressed clients are by recommendations from family and friends, local offices and a quality mark, while underestimating the significance to clients of online searches.

Qamar Anwar, First4Lawyers’ managing director, said clients considered online searches ‘the best-quality enquiry out there.

‘Our own statistics show that a contact that’s come from search engine marketing activity is more likely to convert into a live lead than from any other form of marketing.’

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40% of firms have cut their marketing budget and 19% have made marketing staff redundant. A bullish 17% of firms, however, have increased their marketing spend instead.

The results of the research are contained in First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll