header-logo header-logo

23 October 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’

Personal injury firms may be pointing their marketing efforts at the wrong targets, according to research by legal marketing collective First4Lawyers

More than two-thirds of solicitors polled by the organisation believed clients shopped around before choosing a lawyer. However, the reality is only one quarter do this, which means first impressions are important.

Law firms also tend to make marketing decisions on gut instinct or anecdote rather than hard facts, the research showed, and only half of personal injury firms surveyed analysed the performance of their marketing in the previous quarter or year when making spending decisions.

First4Lawyers’ research also found solicitors overestimate how impressed clients are by recommendations from family and friends, local offices and a quality mark, while underestimating the significance to clients of online searches.

Qamar Anwar, First4Lawyers’ managing director, said clients considered online searches ‘the best-quality enquiry out there.

‘Our own statistics show that a contact that’s come from search engine marketing activity is more likely to convert into a live lead than from any other form of marketing.’

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40% of firms have cut their marketing budget and 19% have made marketing staff redundant. A bullish 17% of firms, however, have increased their marketing spend instead.

The results of the research are contained in First4Lawyers’ white paper, ‘Choosing a lawyer: what drives consumers?’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll