header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

The five-day countdown

Paul Beevers explains why lawyers acting for clients with logbook loans need to act fast

It is surprisingly easy to use a car as security for a secured loan, just like a house. Most lenders call them logbook loans. The loans are usually short term, at least initially, and at higher than average rates of interest: 200%-plus annual percentage rates (APRs) are common. For those who cannot repay their loan the car they have given as security is easily taken from them—and then gone in just five days. Originally, as the name suggests, logbook loans involved leaving the vehicle registration document of the car with the lender, as security for the loan. However, this attempt to create a pawn of the car failed to work, because a vehicle registration document, a V5, is not a document of title—see Joblin v Watkins and Roseveare Motors Ltd [1949] All ER 47 and the statement to that effect on all V5s.

To establish the right to take possession of the car lenders turned to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll