header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

The five-day countdown

Paul Beevers explains why lawyers acting for clients with logbook loans need to act fast

It is surprisingly easy to use a car as security for a secured loan, just like a house. Most lenders call them logbook loans. The loans are usually short term, at least initially, and at higher than average rates of interest: 200%-plus annual percentage rates (APRs) are common. For those who cannot repay their loan the car they have given as security is easily taken from them—and then gone in just five days. Originally, as the name suggests, logbook loans involved leaving the vehicle registration document of the car with the lender, as security for the loan. However, this attempt to create a pawn of the car failed to work, because a vehicle registration document, a V5, is not a document of title—see Joblin v Watkins and Roseveare Motors Ltd [1949] All ER 47 and the statement to that effect on all V5s.

To establish the right to take possession of the car lenders turned to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll