header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

The five-day countdown

Paul Beevers explains why lawyers acting for clients with logbook loans need to act fast

It is surprisingly easy to use a car as security for a secured loan, just like a house. Most lenders call them logbook loans. The loans are usually short term, at least initially, and at higher than average rates of interest: 200%-plus annual percentage rates (APRs) are common. For those who cannot repay their loan the car they have given as security is easily taken from them—and then gone in just five days. Originally, as the name suggests, logbook loans involved leaving the vehicle registration document of the car with the lender, as security for the loan. However, this attempt to create a pawn of the car failed to work, because a vehicle registration document, a V5, is not a document of title—see Joblin v Watkins and Roseveare Motors Ltd [1949] All ER 47 and the statement to that effect on all V5s.

To establish the right to take possession of the car lenders turned to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll