header-logo header-logo

The five-day countdown

10 April 2008 / Paul Beevers
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Paul Beevers explains why lawyers acting for clients with logbook loans need to act fast

It is surprisingly easy to use a car as security for a secured loan, just like a house. Most lenders call them logbook loans. The loans are usually short term, at least initially, and at higher than average rates of interest: 200%-plus annual percentage rates (APRs) are common. For those who cannot repay their loan the car they have given as security is easily taken from them—and then gone in just five days. Originally, as the name suggests, logbook loans involved leaving the vehicle registration document of the car with the lender, as security for the loan. However, this attempt to create a pawn of the car failed to work, because a vehicle registration document, a V5, is not a document of title—see Joblin v Watkins and Roseveare Motors Ltd [1949] All ER 47 and the statement to that effect on all V5s.

To establish the right to take possession of the car lenders turned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll