header-logo header-logo

23 August 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Five serving longer sentences under unduly lenient scheme

Some 61 offenders had their sentences increased last year under the Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme, the Attorney General’s Office has confirmed

Victims, members of the public and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) can ask for certain Crown Court sentences to be reviewed by the Law Officers if they think they’re too low. The Law Officers must then consider the case and, if they think the sentence is too low, ask the Court of Appeal to review it. To be increased, a sentence must be unduly lenient such that the judge made a gross error or imposed a sentence outside the range available.

Of 552 applications received in 2020, 97 were referred to the Court of Appeal. Five of the 61 who had their sentences increased were sent to prison.

Michael Ellis QC, the Attorney General, said: ‘In the vast majority of cases judges get it right, but the scheme remains an important tool to ensure that cases can be reviewed where there may have been a gross error in the sentencing decision.

‘It’s not just about increasing sentences, the scheme also provides an important avenue for my office to ask the Court of Appeal for guidance, to help shape the sentencing framework and ensure more consistent sentencing for complex cases.’

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll