header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012 / Jon Holbrook
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

In a fix (2)?

107720910_4

In the second of two articles, Jon Holbrook considers fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies for housing associations

Part 1 of this duo of articles looked at how the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) had amended the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) to create a new sub-species of the secure tenancy known as the flexible tenancy, which English local authorities have been able to grant since 1 April 2012. This article examines how English housing associations are given greater freedom to use fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies, due to changes in the regulatory framework. Although not technically “flexible tenancies”, as introduced by LA 2011, they share the key component of flexible tenancies in being a fixed-term tenancy, giving the landlord a mandatory right to possession at the end of the fixed-term.

Creating a fixed-term assured shorthold tenancy

A new statutory scheme is not required for housing associations because the Housing Act 1988 already allows landlords to grant fixed-term assured shorthold tenancies, with a mandatory right to possession. But the regulator, the Homes and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll