header-logo header-logo

Fixed costs result delights barristers but dismays costs lawyers

05 February 2024
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Fixed costs result delights barristers but dismays costs lawyers

Costs lawyers have lost out and barristers gained from Ministry of Justice (MoJ) changes to fixed recoverable costs.

Issuing its response last week to its July 2023 consultation on fixed recoverable costs, the MoJ said it will introduce fixed costs for assessments, aiming to implement these in October. Expressing disappointment, David Bailey-Vella, vice-chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL), said: ‘We strongly reject the notion that such work, requiring a very high level of experience and expertise, can be correctly served by a condensed assessment procedure and where the proposed costs [£500] are nominal at best.

‘We note that the MoJ announcement does not mention the level of costs and we will be asking the Civil Procedure Rule Committee to set them at a more realistic level. The ACL argues instead for an escalating and significantly higher cap on costs depending on the value of the claim.

‘While the majority of ACL members agreed with introducing fixed costs for issuing Part 8 costs-only proceedings, they again said the proposed level (£300 for a claimant and £150 for a defendant) was far too low for the work required.’

The MoJ also announced a 23.5% boost in fixed recoverable costs for advocacy fees in civil cases―the rise represents a decade of inflation calculated from 2013 to January 2023.

Initial proposals to uprate from 2016 were changed after the Bar Council and Personal Injuries Bar Association (PIBA) argued the case for backdating to 2013, when the fees were last fixed. The changes will take effect in April.

The MoJ has also agreed to ensure barristers are paid for work in cases that are vacated or settled late. In fast-track cases, where damages of up to £25,000 are sought, barristers will be able to recover 100% fees on the day of, or day before, trial and 75% two days before trial. The same rules will apply in intermediate cases, which are worth up to £100,000, except barristers can recover 75% fees up to five days before trial.

Responding, in September 2023, to the consultation on fixed recoverable costs, the Bar Council and PIBA highlighted there was no facility where cases settled or vacated shortly before trial for wronged parties to recover legal fees paid for trial preparation.

Sam Townend KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The increase in fees and widening scope of fee recovery in cases that are vacated or settled shortly before trial is long overdue and welcome.

‘In securing these changes, we argued that barristers should be paid a reasonable fee for work done, and that the costs regime should help, not hinder, settlement and getting the backlogs in the county courts down. We continue to work to secure a commitment to automatic annual inflation-linked uprating.’

Townend said the fee increases would ‘particularly benefit more junior barristers who generally carry out this work’.

Issue: 8058 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll