header-logo header-logo

26 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fixed fees worry the City

Concern over risks to profitability due to demand for fixed fees

City law firms are experiencing mounting concern about clients’ demands for fixed fees rather than hourly rates. 

The firms fear the rising number of fixed-fee requests will hit their profitability and force them to make permanent adjustments in pricing practice, according to Thomson Reuters Legal annual research among finance directors at the top 100 UK law firms.

Nearly half the finance directors surveyed considered fixed-fee work a high risk to profitability. Only 12% said the trend posed a low risk.

Fixed fees present a higher risk because work can overrun or unforeseen issues arise with the firm powerless to charge for the extra hours involved. Firms are also under pressure to tender competitively, and may under-estimate the cost of work.

Sam Steer, head of large law for Thomson Reuters UK Legal, says: “Finance directors are well aware that getting pricing right is critical to minimising cost over-runs, but this is still relatively new territory for lawyers. Many are still finding their way in assessing costs accurately, particularly for complex or contentious work and at the same time they are under intense pressure to submit competitively-priced tenders which means pricing has to be very tight.”

The firms ranked downward pressure on fees from clients as their number one threat to profitability—more than three-quarters of those surveyed cited demand for discounted fees as the most significant risk faced by their firm, compared to just over half in 2011.

Just over a quarter of finance directors said they were also very concerned about clients consolidating their legal panels—thus reducing the amount of potential work available and driving down fees for those firms that are retained.

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll