header-logo header-logo

Fixed fees worry the City

26 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Concern over risks to profitability due to demand for fixed fees

City law firms are experiencing mounting concern about clients’ demands for fixed fees rather than hourly rates. 

The firms fear the rising number of fixed-fee requests will hit their profitability and force them to make permanent adjustments in pricing practice, according to Thomson Reuters Legal annual research among finance directors at the top 100 UK law firms.

Nearly half the finance directors surveyed considered fixed-fee work a high risk to profitability. Only 12% said the trend posed a low risk.

Fixed fees present a higher risk because work can overrun or unforeseen issues arise with the firm powerless to charge for the extra hours involved. Firms are also under pressure to tender competitively, and may under-estimate the cost of work.

Sam Steer, head of large law for Thomson Reuters UK Legal, says: “Finance directors are well aware that getting pricing right is critical to minimising cost over-runs, but this is still relatively new territory for lawyers. Many are still finding their way in assessing costs accurately, particularly for complex or contentious work and at the same time they are under intense pressure to submit competitively-priced tenders which means pricing has to be very tight.”

The firms ranked downward pressure on fees from clients as their number one threat to profitability—more than three-quarters of those surveyed cited demand for discounted fees as the most significant risk faced by their firm, compared to just over half in 2011.

Just over a quarter of finance directors said they were also very concerned about clients consolidating their legal panels—thus reducing the amount of potential work available and driving down fees for those firms that are retained.

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll