header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
21 October 2016 / LW Blake
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A footnote in history

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7719_blake

After Lord Mansfield’s judgment: whatever happened to James Somerset, asks LW Blake​

James Somerset (or Somersett, or Sommersett,or Summersett) is the most famous freed slave in English legal history. He and his erstwhile slave-owner Charles Stewart were the two litigants who stood before Lord Mansfield CJ in July 1772, in the case of Somerset v Stewart (1772) Lofft 1, 20 State Tr 1. The mystery is: what happened to James Somerset after Lord Mansfield’s judgment in his favour? It is also a mystery about how an unhelpful footnote (which purports to explain the future fate of James Somerset) ever found its way into a standard textbook on constitutional law.

This is a mystery worthy of an MR James ghost story. A Warning to the Curious would have been a good title for this investigation, if he (James) had not already used that title and made it the underlying theme of all his short stories.

Oxford Dictionary of National Biography

According to Ruth Paley, in her valuable biographical entry for James Somerset in the Oxford Dictionary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll