header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Mark Bowman
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Force Majeure?

Mark Bowman suggests when to see beyond an Act of God

The 18 January 2007 was one of the windiest days in Britain for years. Planes, trains and ferry services were cancelled, motorways closed and hundreds of trees fell as winds of in excess of 90 miles per hour were reported.

Mr M, a lecturer at Southgate College in London, had completed his classes for the morning and was walking along the main driveway of part of the college campus when a sudden gust of wind blew over a mature copper beech tree, adjacent to a car park (where hundreds of students/lecturers would pass each day). The tree landed on Mr M and he suffered severe spinal and psychiatric injuries as a result. He was subsequently medically retired on the grounds of ill health.

Act of God?

At first glance it appeared as though this was a typical “Act of God” scenario—where the defendant in this case, presumably Southgate College, would reasonably point to the high winds, the number of trees falling throughout Britain, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll