header-logo header-logo

A foregone conclusion?

09 November 2012 / Marc Weller
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Would an independent Scotland automatically be a member state of the EU? Marc Weller investigates

It has become a matter of some controversy whether the Scottish government has obtained legal advice on Scotland’s EU status post-independence. The substantive question of Scotland’s future EU membership is, however, of no less importance than the question of whether or not legal advice was received. After all, the decision of many voters in the referendum on independence may depend on whether or not continuous EU membership would be guaranteed in case secession is achieved.

The Scottish nationalists have claimed that the matter is a foregone conclusion—membership is automatic. They have invoked some legal authority in favour of this proposition, including the views of the former president of the European Court of Justice, Lord MacKenzie-Stuart. More recently, the Scottish first minister, Alex Salmond, has opined, somewhat more nebulously, that the issue would be addressed “from within the context of the EU”.

On the other hand, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office reportedly warned, through a spokesman, that continued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll