header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Marc Weller
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A foregone conclusion?

Would an independent Scotland automatically be a member state of the EU? Marc Weller investigates

It has become a matter of some controversy whether the Scottish government has obtained legal advice on Scotland’s EU status post-independence. The substantive question of Scotland’s future EU membership is, however, of no less importance than the question of whether or not legal advice was received. After all, the decision of many voters in the referendum on independence may depend on whether or not continuous EU membership would be guaranteed in case secession is achieved.

The Scottish nationalists have claimed that the matter is a foregone conclusion—membership is automatic. They have invoked some legal authority in favour of this proposition, including the views of the former president of the European Court of Justice, Lord MacKenzie-Stuart. More recently, the Scottish first minister, Alex Salmond, has opined, somewhat more nebulously, that the issue would be addressed “from within the context of the EU”.

On the other hand, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office reportedly warned, through a spokesman, that continued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll