header-logo header-logo

A foregone conclusion?

09 November 2012 / Marc Weller
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Opinion , Public , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Would an independent Scotland automatically be a member state of the EU? Marc Weller investigates

It has become a matter of some controversy whether the Scottish government has obtained legal advice on Scotland’s EU status post-independence. The substantive question of Scotland’s future EU membership is, however, of no less importance than the question of whether or not legal advice was received. After all, the decision of many voters in the referendum on independence may depend on whether or not continuous EU membership would be guaranteed in case secession is achieved.

The Scottish nationalists have claimed that the matter is a foregone conclusion—membership is automatic. They have invoked some legal authority in favour of this proposition, including the views of the former president of the European Court of Justice, Lord MacKenzie-Stuart. More recently, the Scottish first minister, Alex Salmond, has opined, somewhat more nebulously, that the issue would be addressed “from within the context of the EU”.

On the other hand, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office reportedly warned, through a spokesman, that continued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll