header-logo header-logo

Foreign affairs

28 July 2011 / Mariko Wilson , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Mariko Wilson & Kim Beatson examine financial relief following marital breakdown in an overseas jurisdiction

By virtue of Pt 3 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), English Courts have the power to grant financial relief where a marriage has been dissolved or annulled or the parties have been legally separated in an overseas jurisdiction. The dissolution, annulment or legal separation must, however, be recognised as valid in England and Wales before MFPA 1984 can be invoked.

Part 3 of MFPA 1984 remedies the potential hardship suffered following an overseas divorce by enabling the Court to make Orders for financial provision including property adjustment, pension sharing, Orders for sale, interim Orders, avoidance of disposition Orders and transfers of tenancies.

Considerations for the Court

Before making any Order for financial relief, the Court has a duty to consider whether in all the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate for such an Order to be made by a Court in England or Wales. The Court should also have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll