header-logo header-logo

Foreign judgments: home & away

06 December 2024 / Lauren Pardoe , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Insolvency , International , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
200301
The courts have provided welcome clarity on enforcing foreign judgments in English insolvency proceedings: Lauren Pardoe & Camilla Pratt outline the opportunities & challenges
  • Two recent decisions have confirmed that foreign judgments can serve as the basis for bankruptcy or winding-up petitions, even if they are not formally registered or recognised in the courts of England and Wales.
  • For creditors, this approach may reduce the time and costs typically associated with enforcing judgments or initiating fresh proceedings.
  • It appears that the English courts will not automatically enforce a foreign judgment, particularly where a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds exists.

Following recent High Court decisions, solicitors involved in cross-border insolvency and debt recovery matters will welcome the clarity provided in relation to the treatment of foreign judgments in the context of the current insolvency regime. Recent cases, including Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2024] EWHC 521 (Ch) and Re a Company [2024] EWHC 1070 (Ch) confirm that foreign judgments, incontrovertibly owed, can indeed serve

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll