header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / Lauren Pardoe , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Insolvency , International , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Foreign judgments: home & away

200301
The courts have provided welcome clarity on enforcing foreign judgments in English insolvency proceedings: Lauren Pardoe & Camilla Pratt outline the opportunities & challenges
  • Two recent decisions have confirmed that foreign judgments can serve as the basis for bankruptcy or winding-up petitions, even if they are not formally registered or recognised in the courts of England and Wales.
  • For creditors, this approach may reduce the time and costs typically associated with enforcing judgments or initiating fresh proceedings.
  • It appears that the English courts will not automatically enforce a foreign judgment, particularly where a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds exists.

Following recent High Court decisions, solicitors involved in cross-border insolvency and debt recovery matters will welcome the clarity provided in relation to the treatment of foreign judgments in the context of the current insolvency regime. Recent cases, including Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2024] EWHC 521 (Ch) and Re a Company [2024] EWHC 1070 (Ch) confirm that foreign judgments, incontrovertibly owed, can indeed serve

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll