header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / Lauren Pardoe , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Insolvency , International , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Foreign judgments: home & away

200301
The courts have provided welcome clarity on enforcing foreign judgments in English insolvency proceedings: Lauren Pardoe & Camilla Pratt outline the opportunities & challenges
  • Two recent decisions have confirmed that foreign judgments can serve as the basis for bankruptcy or winding-up petitions, even if they are not formally registered or recognised in the courts of England and Wales.
  • For creditors, this approach may reduce the time and costs typically associated with enforcing judgments or initiating fresh proceedings.
  • It appears that the English courts will not automatically enforce a foreign judgment, particularly where a bona fide dispute on substantial grounds exists.

Following recent High Court decisions, solicitors involved in cross-border insolvency and debt recovery matters will welcome the clarity provided in relation to the treatment of foreign judgments in the context of the current insolvency regime. Recent cases, including Drelle v Servis-Terminal LLC [2024] EWHC 521 (Ch) and Re a Company [2024] EWHC 1070 (Ch) confirm that foreign judgments, incontrovertibly owed, can indeed serve

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll