header-logo header-logo

Forty years of IRLR

02 November 2012 / Michael Rubenstein
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Michael Rubenstein reflects on the employment law changes he has witnessed since 1972

Industrial Relations Law Reports (IRLR) is celebrating its 40th anniversary this year. I have had the honour of editing it from the start. The very phrase “industrial relations” is now anachronistic, but although the context is now very different, most of our core employment legislation has its origins in the 1970s, as does the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

EAT

EAT decisions have formed the heart of IRLR since the court began sitting in 1976. In the early days, it was inevitable that EAT judges would have little background in employment law, let alone the emerging area of discrimination law. In the case of Sir Gordon Slynn and Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson, this was of little consequence - both were brilliant lawyers. The policy for many years of rotating the EAT presidency between judges from the Family, Chancery and Queen’s Bench Division was not appropriate, however.

In contrast, all the EAT presidents from Mr Justice Morison onwards in 1997 appear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll