header-logo header-logo

Forty years of IRLR

02 November 2012 / Michael Rubenstein
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Michael Rubenstein reflects on the employment law changes he has witnessed since 1972

Industrial Relations Law Reports (IRLR) is celebrating its 40th anniversary this year. I have had the honour of editing it from the start. The very phrase “industrial relations” is now anachronistic, but although the context is now very different, most of our core employment legislation has its origins in the 1970s, as does the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).

EAT

EAT decisions have formed the heart of IRLR since the court began sitting in 1976. In the early days, it was inevitable that EAT judges would have little background in employment law, let alone the emerging area of discrimination law. In the case of Sir Gordon Slynn and Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson, this was of little consequence - both were brilliant lawyers. The policy for many years of rotating the EAT presidency between judges from the Family, Chancery and Queen’s Bench Division was not appropriate, however.

In contrast, all the EAT presidents from Mr Justice Morison onwards in 1997 appear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll