header-logo header-logo

07 March 2014 / Lizanne Gumbel KC , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Fostering a duty?

Richard Scorer & Lizanne Gumbel QC discuss the liability of local authorities for foster carers

Awareness of child abuse is growing, and an increasing number of victims are coming forward to allege abuse, both present and historic. So it is essential that children in foster care have the same legal protection as other looked after children. That protection includes the right to compensation when abused by carers. Compensation claims for abuse are now a well-established form of litigation; at any one time there are several thousand cases against schools, hospitals and religious organisations who are alleged to have abused or neglected children in some way.

Most of these claims are made on the basis of vicarious liability: where the abuse is committed by the defendant’s employee, in the course of employment, the organisation is liable in damages pursuant to Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22, [2001] All ER (D) 37 (May). Thus where a “looked after” child suffers abuse in a secure unit or children’s home, and that abuse is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll