header-logo header-logo

Fostering a duty?

07 March 2014 / Lizanne Gumbel KC , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer & Lizanne Gumbel QC discuss the liability of local authorities for foster carers

Awareness of child abuse is growing, and an increasing number of victims are coming forward to allege abuse, both present and historic. So it is essential that children in foster care have the same legal protection as other looked after children. That protection includes the right to compensation when abused by carers. Compensation claims for abuse are now a well-established form of litigation; at any one time there are several thousand cases against schools, hospitals and religious organisations who are alleged to have abused or neglected children in some way.

Most of these claims are made on the basis of vicarious liability: where the abuse is committed by the defendant’s employee, in the course of employment, the organisation is liable in damages pursuant to Lister v Hesley Hall [2001] UKHL 22, [2001] All ER (D) 37 (May). Thus where a “looked after” child suffers abuse in a secure unit or children’s home, and that abuse is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll