header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
07 February 2014 / Stephen Boyd
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

In the frame

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_boyd

Stephen Boyd advises debtors on the best course of action when faced with a camera crew

There seems to be an endless appetite for reality television programmes. The viewer seems to find actual real-life drama even more entertaining than the made-up stuff.

The latest twist on the theme is the so-called “tag-along raid” when a film crew accompanies bailiffs when enforcing judgments at the debtor’s premises (eg The Sheriffs are Coming , BBC One).

What, if anything, can a debtor do about this, or must he be an unwilling participant in the television stations’ quest for viewers?

There are two possible avenues, one of which is more promising than the other.

Defamation

In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor. This would be actionable, if false.

The difficulties with this course are that in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, [1891-4] All ER Rep 965 the Court of Appeal held that an interim injunction will not be granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll