header-logo header-logo

In the frame

07 February 2014 / Stephen Boyd
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_boyd

Stephen Boyd advises debtors on the best course of action when faced with a camera crew

There seems to be an endless appetite for reality television programmes. The viewer seems to find actual real-life drama even more entertaining than the made-up stuff.

The latest twist on the theme is the so-called “tag-along raid” when a film crew accompanies bailiffs when enforcing judgments at the debtor’s premises (eg The Sheriffs are Coming , BBC One).

What, if anything, can a debtor do about this, or must he be an unwilling participant in the television stations’ quest for viewers?

There are two possible avenues, one of which is more promising than the other.

Defamation

In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor. This would be actionable, if false.

The difficulties with this course are that in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, [1891-4] All ER Rep 965 the Court of Appeal held that an interim injunction will not be granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll