header-logo header-logo

07 February 2014 / Stephen Boyd
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

In the frame

web_boyd

Stephen Boyd advises debtors on the best course of action when faced with a camera crew

There seems to be an endless appetite for reality television programmes. The viewer seems to find actual real-life drama even more entertaining than the made-up stuff.

The latest twist on the theme is the so-called “tag-along raid” when a film crew accompanies bailiffs when enforcing judgments at the debtor’s premises (eg The Sheriffs are Coming , BBC One).

What, if anything, can a debtor do about this, or must he be an unwilling participant in the television stations’ quest for viewers?

There are two possible avenues, one of which is more promising than the other.

Defamation

In showing the enforcement officer attending at premises, the innuendo would be that the subject of the execution was a judgment debtor. This would be actionable, if false.

The difficulties with this course are that in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, [1891-4] All ER Rep 965 the Court of Appeal held that an interim injunction will not be granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll