header-logo header-logo

Fraud & punishment

10 March 2017 / Professor Mark Button
Issue: 7737 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
nlj_7737_button

Mark Button details research which will help to map & rank alternative justice systems for fraud

In recent years there have been a number of high profile cases of high status professionals sanctioned for serious fraud related behaviours by regulatory bodies, rather than the criminal justice system. For instance in 2012 the Daily Mirror (2012) ran a front page headline: “Call this justice? City banker steals £1.4m... no charge. Shop worker steals £10k... 9 months’ jail” after the then Financial Services Authority (FSA) published a regulatory decision regarding a senior executive in a private equity firm who had, in the words of the FSA (2012), “fraudulently obtained” just under £1.4m. His punishment from the FSA was a financial penalty just short of £3m and an order banning him from working in financial services. There was, however, no criminal prosecution. More recently another senior city worker, who had regularly failed to purchase a rail ticket, amounting to a £43,000 loss for the rail companies was dealt with by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll