header-logo header-logo

Freedom of information: Public interest boundaries

26 March 2009 / Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Dr Russell Richardson considers when knowledge is in the public interest

* * * * * *

The Court of Appeal last month has upheld part of an appeal by Ofcom of the Information Tribunal's (IT) decision that it should disclose the national database of information on 2G/3G mobile masts it holds (see Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, [2009] All ER (D) 212 (Feb)).

In doing so, the court overturned previous wisdom by deciding that, when considering the public interest under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391) (the regulations), the IT should consider the public interest exercise by aggregating the public interest considerations for each exception, rather than considering them singularly.

Unlawful use

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that when considering the public interest, in dismissing part of Ofcom's appeal, the IT could take into account that the information was to be used for a “beneficial” purpose even where such use would be unlawful. Although the consideration of this unlawful use is based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll