header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information: Public interest boundaries

Dr Russell Richardson considers when knowledge is in the public interest

* * * * * *

The Court of Appeal last month has upheld part of an appeal by Ofcom of the Information Tribunal's (IT) decision that it should disclose the national database of information on 2G/3G mobile masts it holds (see Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, [2009] All ER (D) 212 (Feb)).

In doing so, the court overturned previous wisdom by deciding that, when considering the public interest under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391) (the regulations), the IT should consider the public interest exercise by aggregating the public interest considerations for each exception, rather than considering them singularly.

Unlawful use

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that when considering the public interest, in dismissing part of Ofcom's appeal, the IT could take into account that the information was to be used for a “beneficial” purpose even where such use would be unlawful. Although the consideration of this unlawful use is based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll