header-logo header-logo

Freedom of information: Public interest boundaries

26 March 2009 / Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Dr Russell Richardson considers when knowledge is in the public interest

* * * * * *

The Court of Appeal last month has upheld part of an appeal by Ofcom of the Information Tribunal's (IT) decision that it should disclose the national database of information on 2G/3G mobile masts it holds (see Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, [2009] All ER (D) 212 (Feb)).

In doing so, the court overturned previous wisdom by deciding that, when considering the public interest under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391) (the regulations), the IT should consider the public interest exercise by aggregating the public interest considerations for each exception, rather than considering them singularly.

Unlawful use

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that when considering the public interest, in dismissing part of Ofcom's appeal, the IT could take into account that the information was to be used for a “beneficial” purpose even where such use would be unlawful. Although the consideration of this unlawful use is based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll