header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information: Public interest boundaries

Dr Russell Richardson considers when knowledge is in the public interest

* * * * * *

The Court of Appeal last month has upheld part of an appeal by Ofcom of the Information Tribunal's (IT) decision that it should disclose the national database of information on 2G/3G mobile masts it holds (see Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, [2009] All ER (D) 212 (Feb)).

In doing so, the court overturned previous wisdom by deciding that, when considering the public interest under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391) (the regulations), the IT should consider the public interest exercise by aggregating the public interest considerations for each exception, rather than considering them singularly.

Unlawful use

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that when considering the public interest, in dismissing part of Ofcom's appeal, the IT could take into account that the information was to be used for a “beneficial” purpose even where such use would be unlawful. Although the consideration of this unlawful use is based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll