header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Dr Russell Richardson
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information: Public interest boundaries

Dr Russell Richardson considers when knowledge is in the public interest

* * * * * *

The Court of Appeal last month has upheld part of an appeal by Ofcom of the Information Tribunal's (IT) decision that it should disclose the national database of information on 2G/3G mobile masts it holds (see Office of Communications v Information Commissioner [2009] EWCA Civ 90, [2009] All ER (D) 212 (Feb)).

In doing so, the court overturned previous wisdom by deciding that, when considering the public interest under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/3391) (the regulations), the IT should consider the public interest exercise by aggregating the public interest considerations for each exception, rather than considering them singularly.

Unlawful use

The Court of Appeal also confirmed that when considering the public interest, in dismissing part of Ofcom's appeal, the IT could take into account that the information was to be used for a “beneficial” purpose even where such use would be unlawful. Although the consideration of this unlawful use is based

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll