header-logo header-logo

Freedom of religion

13 September 2012 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

HLE blogger James Wilson examines the controversy surrounding religion in the workplace

"The American humourist PJ O’Rourke once said that it was funny how those who wanted to share their religious views with you never wanted you to share yours with them. The European Court of Human Rights is about to share its views with all of us: this week it is hearing four cases on religion and the law.

All four applicants are practising Christians who complain that UK law did not sufficiently protect their rights to freedom of religion and freedom from discrimination at work. Nadia Eweida, a British Airways employee, and Shirley Chaplin, a geriatrics nurse, complain that their employers placed restrictions on their visibly wearing Christian crosses while at work. Lilian Ladele, a registrar of births, deaths and marriages, and Gary McFarlane, a Relate counsellor, complain about their dismissal for refusing to carry out certain of their duties which they considered would condone homosexuality.

One might be forgiven for thinking that the symbols cases were a relatively trivial matter. Almost no-one would be offended by someone wearing a cross.

The answer, however, is that we are back in the realms of legal principle, and while the crosses might well be seen as harmless symbols that merely reflect a mainstream faith, if they are permitted as a legitimate departure from the employer’s otherwise secular uniform policy, someone could turn up wanting to wear something offensive and citing religious grounds for doing so.

One possible response is that relatively inoffensive symbols should be permitted, but not ones that are blatantly offensive.

There are several problems with the court trying to decide what is offensive and what is reasonable. Is it to be judged from the perspective of the victim, the perpetrator or a neutral observer?...”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
back-to-top-scroll