header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 February 2022 / Brian Lacy
Issue: 7967 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail

Freezing orders: a hot take

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Black Swan flies & The Siskina lists: Brian Lacy reports on a key decision on freestanding freezing injunctions
  • In a recent decision, the Privy Council has upheld the British Virgin Islands’ freestanding freezing injunctions.
  • In doing so, it confirmed (obiter) the jurisdiction of the decision in Black Swan, allowing freezing injunctions against BVI respondents to foreign proceedings in aid of potential future enforcement.

On 4 October 2021, the Privy Council handed down its much-anticipated judgment in Broad Idea International Ltd v Convoy Collateral Ltd (British Virgin Islands); Convoy Collateral Ltd v Cho Kwai Chee (also known as Cho Kwai Chee Roy) (British Virgin Islands) [2021] UKPC 24. By a four to three majority, the board:

(1) upheld (albeit obiter) the Black Swan jurisdiction, which, since the original judgment by Bannister J in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in 2010 (Black Swan Investment ISA v Harvest View Limited and another [2010] ECSCJ No. 357) had been a vital tool in aid of judgment and award enforcement in the British Virgin

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll