header-logo header-logo

29 May 2014 / John McKenna
Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

From the frontline

John McKenna reports on the devastating impact of the legal aid cuts on an area of Liverpool

As a solicitors' firm operating in one of the most deprived areas of the country, the impact of the legal aid cuts is startlingly obvious to us. The Breckfield area of Liverpool where Paul Crowley & Co's head office is based is home to a close-knit community but one which knows the meaning of struggle.

Unemployment is an ongoing problem and where people do work minimum wage is the norm. Legal aid, by its very nature, was conceived for people like this and as such the clampdown on it is being felt heavily here.

Disproportionate impact

Last year an early study by the University of Liverpool's Charity Law and Policy Unit found Liverpool would feel a disproportionate impact from the cuts. 

Researchers at the University conducted interviews with 80 charity advice workers in Liverpool and found that the overwhelming majority believe that their organisations are now providing a worse service for their beneficiaries, with many citing staff cuts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll