header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2014 / John McKenna
Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

From the frontline

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

John McKenna reports on the devastating impact of the legal aid cuts on an area of Liverpool

As a solicitors' firm operating in one of the most deprived areas of the country, the impact of the legal aid cuts is startlingly obvious to us. The Breckfield area of Liverpool where Paul Crowley & Co's head office is based is home to a close-knit community but one which knows the meaning of struggle.

Unemployment is an ongoing problem and where people do work minimum wage is the norm. Legal aid, by its very nature, was conceived for people like this and as such the clampdown on it is being felt heavily here.

Disproportionate impact

Last year an early study by the University of Liverpool's Charity Law and Policy Unit found Liverpool would feel a disproportionate impact from the cuts. 

Researchers at the University conducted interviews with 80 charity advice workers in Liverpool and found that the overwhelming majority believe that their organisations are now providing a worse service for their beneficiaries, with many citing staff cuts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll