header-logo header-logo

Fuel for thought

04 December 2008 / Julian Milford
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Environment , Community care
printer mail-detail

Julian Milford assesses the politically charged scenario of fuel poverty
 

Fuel poverty in the UK has increased dramatically over recent years, in tandem with the sharp rise in the price of fuel.

In 2003–04, the government’s estimate was that 1.2 million households were in fuel poverty—defi ned by the government as applying to households that need to spend at least 10% of their income on fuel to maintain a satisfactory heating regime. In 2006—the last year for which government fi gures are available—that estimate had increased to 2.9 million households and 2.4 million of those were “vulnerable” (defi ned as households including older people, families with children, and householders who are disabled or suff ering from long-term illness).

By early 2008, Energywatch estimated that there were around 4.4 million households in the UK suff ering from fuel poverty. Th ree million of those were in England alone. Charities and other public interest organisations accused the government of both failing to help the most vulnerable members of society, who faced possible illness and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll