header-logo header-logo

13 October 2017 / Julian Chamberlayne
Issue: 7765 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Full compensation & the discount rate (Pt 2)

nlj_7765_chamberlayne

Julian Chamberlayne discusses the factors that need to be considered when setting the new discount rate

 

  • Longevity, prices and earnings inflation all compound the investment risk that claimants face under the MoJ’s planned change to setting the discount rate.

On 7 September 2017, the Lord Chancellor, David Liddington, laid draft legislation before Parliament incorporating a proposed new methodology for setting the discount rate by which future losses for those with long-term injuries will be compensated. In the first of this two-part series I considered what proportion of seriously injured claimants should we as a society be prepared to accept will be under compensated while still claiming to maintain a framework of laws that provide for 100% compensation. Here, I look at some of the key factors beyond investment risk that ought to be considered by the Lord Chancellor when setting the new rate.

The Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) new methodology is said to be based on how claimants actually invest, derived from evidence gathered during the consultation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Mark Price

Freeths—Mark Price

Freeths strengthens restructuring and insolvency team with partner appointment

DWF—Caroline Featherstone, Victoria Neil & Matt Lewsey

DWF—Caroline Featherstone, Victoria Neil & Matt Lewsey

DWF strengthens public inquiries team with trio of high-profile appointments

Excello Law—Claire-Elaine Arthurs, Rhian Horwill & Caroline Lamming-Chowen

Excello Law—Claire-Elaine Arthurs, Rhian Horwill & Caroline Lamming-Chowen

Three-lawyer team hire boosts Excello Law’s property litigation practice

NEWS
Foreign judgment creditors have gained a route to recovery after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Drelle v Servis-Terminal
Surrogacy is growing in popularity, but parents-to-be face a complex legal framework
Winning a judgment may be only the beginning of an expensive enforcement battle, writes Professor Dominic Regan in this week's NLJ
Indemnity costs remain exceptional, but parties cannot ignore a case that deteriorates around them. In Lawrence v Associated Newspapers, Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the claimants to pay indemnity costs after finding their conduct, viewed cumulatively, fell ‘well outside the norm’
Public law is in flux following reversals and robust appellate intervention, according to the latest public law update by the team at HSFK for NLJ
back-to-top-scroll