header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fund youth court work properly

Underfunding of youth court work is damaging the interests of defendants, victims and witnesses, barristers have warned

Responding last week to the government’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid, the Bar Council highlighted ‘grave’ weaknesses in the system, including falling numbers of first-time entrant lawyers choosing to work in youth justice due to ‘derisory fees’ for counsel.

It called for legal representation for youths at police stations to be made mandatory; for anyone under 18 years at the time of the alleged offence to be considered a vulnerable person automatically; and for career progression for lawyers specialising in youth justice to be rewarded under fee schemes.

The Bar’s response states: ‘Proper rates of remuneration are by far the most important component in ensuring that the children who remain in the system receive the skilled representation that these serious cases deserve. Unless urgent steps are taken to bring about urgent reform, few able or suitably qualified practitioners will have any incentive to work in this area.’

Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll