header-logo header-logo

17 February 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Fundamental dishonesty claimant convicted

A man who exaggerated his injuries after falling in a pothole has been successfully prosecuted for contempt of court by Walsall Council

A man who exaggerated his injuries after falling in a pothole has been successfully prosecuted for contempt of court by Walsall Council

Nicholas McDaid, 35, of Bloxwich, narrowly escaped an immediate custodial sentence after the hearing. He fully admitted his guilt before the court and was sentenced to two months in prison suspended for 12 months for contempt of court. He was also ordered to pay Walsall Council’s prosecution costs.

McDaid brought a personal injury claim against the council in 2013 for an ankle injury caused by a pothole trip while walking his dogs. He claimed he was unable to work.

However, evidence emerged of him engaged in extreme sports, during this time, competing in ’Iron Man’ triathlons, full and half marathons, cycling challenges and scoring tries for his local Rugby Club. Some of these athletic activities were uploaded to a personal fitness app.

Walsall Council initially paid McDaid an interim payment of about £12,000 but McDaid’s dishonesty came to light, He claimed for loss of earnings and care by his wife and lied to medical experts about his sporting activities.

A court found him ‘fundamentally dishonest’.

McDaid appealed unsuccessfully, arguing that although he had been ‘dishonest’, he had not been ‘fundamentally dishonest’. Mr Justice Martin Spencer, in Birmingham County Court, rejected his argument.

Walsall Council pursued a private prosecution for contempt of court leading to his criminal conviction, which was upheld in December 2019. McDaid pleaded guilty on six counts of contempt of court.

The council said the personal injury claim, if successful, could have cost it more than £200,000 in compensation and costs.

Paul Wainwright, partner at Browne Jacobson, who acted for Walsall Council, said: ‘Given the council’s concerns which were raised by its expert, it was right that a full and thorough investigation was carried out.

‘Those investigations revealed extensive sporting activity which McDaid had dishonestly failed to evidence before the court, giving a false and misleading impression of the effect of his injury for financial gain. The council with Browne Jacobson’s help has clearly demonstrated its determination to take action to prevent fraud, protect the public purse and prosecute fraudsters.’ 

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll