header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fundamental dishonesty first

A defendant who is ‘fundamentally dishonest’ about a part of his insurance claim forfeits his entire claim, the High Court has held. The decision, in Sinfield v London Organising Committee for the Olympics (in Liquidation) [2018] EWHC 51 (QB), is bad news for those who exaggerate when making an otherwise legitimate claim.

The claimant was injured while volunteering at the 2012 Olympics. His claim included false statements about hiring a gardener and false invoices. Liability was admitted in full.

On appeal, Mr Justice Knowles clarified that ‘fundamental dishonesty’ under s 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 occurs where the claimant has ‘substantially affected the presentation of his case’.

Where it occurs, Knowles J said the entire claim should be dismissed, including any genuine element of it, unless the claimant would suffer substantial injustice.

Roger Jones and Martin Stockdale, partners at Kennedys, which acted for the defendant, said the judgment ‘will now become the leading authority’ and clearly shows s 57 has ‘real bite’.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll