header-logo header-logo

Fundamental dishonesty first

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A defendant who is ‘fundamentally dishonest’ about a part of his insurance claim forfeits his entire claim, the High Court has held. The decision, in Sinfield v London Organising Committee for the Olympics (in Liquidation) [2018] EWHC 51 (QB), is bad news for those who exaggerate when making an otherwise legitimate claim.

The claimant was injured while volunteering at the 2012 Olympics. His claim included false statements about hiring a gardener and false invoices. Liability was admitted in full.

On appeal, Mr Justice Knowles clarified that ‘fundamental dishonesty’ under s 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 occurs where the claimant has ‘substantially affected the presentation of his case’.

Where it occurs, Knowles J said the entire claim should be dismissed, including any genuine element of it, unless the claimant would suffer substantial injustice.

Roger Jones and Martin Stockdale, partners at Kennedys, which acted for the defendant, said the judgment ‘will now become the leading authority’ and clearly shows s 57 has ‘real bite’.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll