header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fundamental dishonesty first

A defendant who is ‘fundamentally dishonest’ about a part of his insurance claim forfeits his entire claim, the High Court has held. The decision, in Sinfield v London Organising Committee for the Olympics (in Liquidation) [2018] EWHC 51 (QB), is bad news for those who exaggerate when making an otherwise legitimate claim.

The claimant was injured while volunteering at the 2012 Olympics. His claim included false statements about hiring a gardener and false invoices. Liability was admitted in full.

On appeal, Mr Justice Knowles clarified that ‘fundamental dishonesty’ under s 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 occurs where the claimant has ‘substantially affected the presentation of his case’.

Where it occurs, Knowles J said the entire claim should be dismissed, including any genuine element of it, unless the claimant would suffer substantial injustice.

Roger Jones and Martin Stockdale, partners at Kennedys, which acted for the defendant, said the judgment ‘will now become the leading authority’ and clearly shows s 57 has ‘real bite’.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll