header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7778

26 January 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Free searches; hurry!; CPR welcome; Reclaiming after strike out; Tell the truth.

Richard Harrison considers the practicalities & legalities of ‘coming off the record’

UK higher education & Brexit—Hilary Aldred asks if there is any silver lining

Roderick Ramage reworks William Shakespeare in bite-size format

Paul McClorry discusses jurisdiction in claims which occur in countries outside of the EU

How will Brexit affect the flow of EU students to UK universities? Matthew Homewood & Simon Boyes share their predictions

Alec Samuels reflects on a war that has not yet been won

Breaking (new) law: David Burrows reports on the challenges of Re M (Children)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll