header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 January 2018 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Ceasing to act

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7778_harrison

Richard Harrison considers the practicalities & legalities of ‘coming off the record’

  • What is the effect on a court case of a solicitor ceasing to act for a client?
  • What are the requirements to put this into effect?

Many (including possibly some judges) share the mistaken belief that, even if solicitors have validly terminated their retainer with a client, they owe duties to the court to continue to incur costs and represent the client unless the court gives them permission to withdraw. Quite simply that is not the case. The process for ceasing to act does not entail getting permission from the court to stop representing the client.

The requirements under CPR Pt 42.3 are, as the commentary makes clear, based on establishing certainty of communication and service. The rule is headed: ‘Order that a solicitor has ceased to act’ and states that ‘a solicitor may apply for an order declaring that he has ceased to be the solicitor acting for a party’.

This is not framed in terms of permission to stop acting.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll