header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007 / Jon Newman
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Fundamental justice

Our justice system should be driven by integrity and fairness, not just economics, says Jon Newman

Any MPs who had been hoping for a gentle return from the summer break may be feeling a little aggrieved. On 8 October the House of Commons resumes business with the second reading of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. This is a major piece of legislation, spanning 129 clauses, 23 schedules and 236 pages.

The task will perhaps be eased by the extensive practice many members have had in scrutinising criminal justice proposals. Since 1997, more legislation has emanated from the Home Office than the preceding 100 years. Last year, the volume of fresh law had reached such a level it was reported that Labour was establishing new offences at double the rate of the previous Conservative administration (The Independent, 16 August 2006).

The danger is that this Bill becomes “just another” in the series, merely adding to the pile of legislation which many believe is congesting the system. However, two key factors distinguish it from its predecessors:
- It is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll