header-logo header-logo

Fundamental justice

04 October 2007 / Jon Newman
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Our justice system should be driven by integrity and fairness, not just economics, says Jon Newman

Any MPs who had been hoping for a gentle return from the summer break may be feeling a little aggrieved. On 8 October the House of Commons resumes business with the second reading of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. This is a major piece of legislation, spanning 129 clauses, 23 schedules and 236 pages.

The task will perhaps be eased by the extensive practice many members have had in scrutinising criminal justice proposals. Since 1997, more legislation has emanated from the Home Office than the preceding 100 years. Last year, the volume of fresh law had reached such a level it was reported that Labour was establishing new offences at double the rate of the previous Conservative administration (The Independent, 16 August 2006).

The danger is that this Bill becomes “just another” in the series, merely adding to the pile of legislation which many believe is congesting the system. However, two key factors distinguish it from its predecessors:
- It is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll