header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007 / Jon Newman
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Fundamental justice

Our justice system should be driven by integrity and fairness, not just economics, says Jon Newman

Any MPs who had been hoping for a gentle return from the summer break may be feeling a little aggrieved. On 8 October the House of Commons resumes business with the second reading of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. This is a major piece of legislation, spanning 129 clauses, 23 schedules and 236 pages.

The task will perhaps be eased by the extensive practice many members have had in scrutinising criminal justice proposals. Since 1997, more legislation has emanated from the Home Office than the preceding 100 years. Last year, the volume of fresh law had reached such a level it was reported that Labour was establishing new offences at double the rate of the previous Conservative administration (The Independent, 16 August 2006).

The danger is that this Bill becomes “just another” in the series, merely adding to the pile of legislation which many believe is congesting the system. However, two key factors distinguish it from its predecessors:
- It is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll