header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007 / Jon Newman
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Fundamental justice

Our justice system should be driven by integrity and fairness, not just economics, says Jon Newman

Any MPs who had been hoping for a gentle return from the summer break may be feeling a little aggrieved. On 8 October the House of Commons resumes business with the second reading of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. This is a major piece of legislation, spanning 129 clauses, 23 schedules and 236 pages.

The task will perhaps be eased by the extensive practice many members have had in scrutinising criminal justice proposals. Since 1997, more legislation has emanated from the Home Office than the preceding 100 years. Last year, the volume of fresh law had reached such a level it was reported that Labour was establishing new offences at double the rate of the previous Conservative administration (The Independent, 16 August 2006).

The danger is that this Bill becomes “just another” in the series, merely adding to the pile of legislation which many believe is congesting the system. However, two key factors distinguish it from its predecessors:
- It is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll