header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Future Bar training

While the Solicitors Qualifying Exam has stalled, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) is forging ahead with discussions on how to train the next crop of barristers.

Last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority extended this month’s deadline for its decision in principle—the details are due to be ironed out at a later stage—on whether to introduce the exam. It will now take a decision in spring 2017, with the exam not in place until the 2019/2020 academic year at the earliest, if it goes ahead at all. Its proposals have so far been met with fierce opposition from universities and training providers.

Over at the Bar, however, three options for qualification have been proposed. The “evolutionary” option focuses on liberalising the training and increasing flexibility but would otherwise keep the qualification route as it is. The “managed pathways” option would keep the existing route to qualification but add three other routes: combined law degree and vocational training; vocational training programme integrated with pupillage; and a modular approach where candidates commit to training one step at a time. The “Bar specialist” option proposes a qualifying exam, open to any candidate—successful candidates would then undergo a training course shorter than the Bar Professional Training Course.

Next month, the BSB will host a debate, The Future Bar Training. Guest speakers will give presentations on the possible options. Register your interest for the event on 7 July at futurebartraining@barstandardsboard.org.uk.

The BSB will launch a consultation later this year, with a view to implementing the changes from the 2018-19 academic year.  

BSB director of education and training, Dr Simon Thornton-Wood, says: “By introducing a more flexible route to qualification, we hope to ensure future access to the profession in a way that enables candidates from all walks of life to consider a career at the Bar. The future of Bar training should ensure it produces competent barristers, and ultimately a legal system in which a diverse public can have confidence.”

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll