header-logo header-logo

Future proof

29 October 2009 / James Naylor
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

While seeing into the future is not yet expected of property lawyers, advising as to future risk is, says James Naylor

In Stoll, Darren Atkins, Brambleridge Management Limited v Wacks Caller (a firm) [2009] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Cs instructed D, a now defunct firm of Manchester solicitors, to purchase development property, for the sum of £400,000.

The purchase contract was conditional upon Cs obtaining planning permission for the conversion of the property into two flats, with a further dwelling at the rear.

Completion was due to take place on the 21st day following the date of planning permission; save that if the planning application was refused, or if the sale and purchase was not completed within six months of exchange, the sale agreement was to lapse.

Contracts were exchanged following the grant of planning permission by Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (the council) on 30 July 2003, and completion took place on 19 August 2003.

However, the proposed development never proceeded because, post-completion, on 9 September 2003, out-of-the-blue, Cs new neighbours applied for judicial review of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll