header-logo header-logo

Future proof?

29 November 2013 / Toby Frost
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
web_frost

Toby Frost examines the approaches that science fiction takes to the rule of law

Much science fiction is set in a lawless world. Most obviously, there are other planets, whether airless moons or extravagant jungles, where the rule of law simply doesn’t exist. In space, as the saying goes, no-one can hear you scream, let alone apply for permission to appeal. But there are also the dystopias, where the true rule of law is displaced by the rule of brute force.

 

The police state

From George Orwell’s 1984 to Judge Dredd in the comic 2000 AD, science fiction has been haunted by the police state. What might at first look like an excess of law is usually a lack of it: without precedent to bind them or the courts to provide protection to the citizen, the futuristic police are able to torture and kill as they please. In Margaret Atwood’s dystopia The Handmaid’s Tale, the narrator explains that lawyers are no longer needed when the nation is run by a theocracy representing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll