header-logo header-logo

18 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The future for reserved legal activities

Will writing, conveyancing and immigration services should become reserved legal activities, according to a legal think tank.

Reserved legal activities can only be carried out by appropriately authorised persons and currently include rights of audience, conduct of litigation, reserved instrument activities, probate activities, notarial activities, and the administration of oaths.

In a paper published last week, the Legal Services Institute (LSI) proposed that probate be extended to include the administration of estates, and that conveyancing services be added to the property-related reserved instrument, in the Legal Services Act 2007.

It proposed that insolvency practice and claims management services be excluded.

The paper, The Regulation of Legal Services: What Is The Case For Reservation?, argues that authority to practise reserved activities should be conferred by accreditation and not confined to legally qualified practitioners.

LSI director, Stephen Mayson says: “If the reserved activities are anachronistic or lacking an articulated public interest justification—which we believe they currently are—there is a significant risk that the Legal Services Act 2007 will have promoted (and the Legal Services Board will be overseeing) an increasingly irrelevant regulatory infrastructure that does not secure sufficient public benefit or consumer protection.”

Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll