header-logo header-logo

The future for reserved legal activities

18 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Will writing, conveyancing and immigration services should become reserved legal activities, according to a legal think tank.

Reserved legal activities can only be carried out by appropriately authorised persons and currently include rights of audience, conduct of litigation, reserved instrument activities, probate activities, notarial activities, and the administration of oaths.

In a paper published last week, the Legal Services Institute (LSI) proposed that probate be extended to include the administration of estates, and that conveyancing services be added to the property-related reserved instrument, in the Legal Services Act 2007.

It proposed that insolvency practice and claims management services be excluded.

The paper, The Regulation of Legal Services: What Is The Case For Reservation?, argues that authority to practise reserved activities should be conferred by accreditation and not confined to legally qualified practitioners.

LSI director, Stephen Mayson says: “If the reserved activities are anachronistic or lacking an articulated public interest justification—which we believe they currently are—there is a significant risk that the Legal Services Act 2007 will have promoted (and the Legal Services Board will be overseeing) an increasingly irrelevant regulatory infrastructure that does not secure sufficient public benefit or consumer protection.”

Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll