header-logo header-logo

GAME decision reassures landlords

05 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lewison: existing law left in "very unsatisfactory state"

Commercial rent is payable when a company falls into administration, the Court of Appeal has held.

Ruling in Pillar Denton v Jervis [2014] EWCA Civ 180, Lord Justice Lewison described the existing law as having been left in a “very unsatisfactory state” by previous High Court rulings. He said rent should be treated as accruing from day to day, and was payable as an expense of the winding up or administration.

The case, brought by a consortium of landlords, concerned a dispute over £3m in back rent due prior to the collapse of digital game retailer GAME.

Previously, if a company entered administration the day after the quarterly rent payment was due, the rent for that quarter could legally go unpaid, with the landlords being only an unsecured creditor and paid a percentage of assets realised during the administration. This effectively gave the administrators a three-month grace period, in which they could trade while seeking a buyer.

Paul Booth, head of commercial litigation at Baxter Caulfield, says: “The appeal court ruling means rent will now be classed as an expense of an administration, which is paid ahead of creditors, and administrators must pay rent for any time that they occupy a property.”

He says the ruling will stop “tactical administrations”. 

Ian Fletcher, director of policy at the British Property Federation, says: “This is the fairest outcome for all, as it means that landlords get paid and that insolvency practitioners can trade over the best timeframe for the rescue of the business.”

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll