header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

GAME decision reassures landlords

Lewison: existing law left in "very unsatisfactory state"

Commercial rent is payable when a company falls into administration, the Court of Appeal has held.

Ruling in Pillar Denton v Jervis [2014] EWCA Civ 180, Lord Justice Lewison described the existing law as having been left in a “very unsatisfactory state” by previous High Court rulings. He said rent should be treated as accruing from day to day, and was payable as an expense of the winding up or administration.

The case, brought by a consortium of landlords, concerned a dispute over £3m in back rent due prior to the collapse of digital game retailer GAME.

Previously, if a company entered administration the day after the quarterly rent payment was due, the rent for that quarter could legally go unpaid, with the landlords being only an unsecured creditor and paid a percentage of assets realised during the administration. This effectively gave the administrators a three-month grace period, in which they could trade while seeking a buyer.

Paul Booth, head of commercial litigation at Baxter Caulfield, says: “The appeal court ruling means rent will now be classed as an expense of an administration, which is paid ahead of creditors, and administrators must pay rent for any time that they occupy a property.”

He says the ruling will stop “tactical administrations”. 

Ian Fletcher, director of policy at the British Property Federation, says: “This is the fairest outcome for all, as it means that landlords get paid and that insolvency practitioners can trade over the best timeframe for the rescue of the business.”

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll