header-logo header-logo

Game of thrones

08 May 2015 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_may_8_princess

Neil Parpworth examines the impact of the Succession to the Crown Act 2013

Although the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013, its key provisions did not enter into force until 26 March 2015: see the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 (Commencement) Order 2015 (SI 2015/894). It is a constitutionally important measure since it addresses several pieces of discrimination relating to the monarchy.

Succession

Hitherto, succession to the Crown has been determined by applying the common law principle of male preference primogeniture. On the death of a monarch, the throne has normally passed to their eldest and nearest male relative (usually a son), and the line of succession has been constructed accordingly.

Under s 1 of the 2013 Act, succession to the Crown is no longer dependent on gender. In the case of persons born after 28 October 2011, their place in the line of succession depends solely on when they were born. In practice, of course, the new succession arrangements are unlikely to have much effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll