header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Game of thrones

nlj_may_8_princess

Neil Parpworth examines the impact of the Succession to the Crown Act 2013

Although the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013, its key provisions did not enter into force until 26 March 2015: see the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 (Commencement) Order 2015 (SI 2015/894). It is a constitutionally important measure since it addresses several pieces of discrimination relating to the monarchy.

Succession

Hitherto, succession to the Crown has been determined by applying the common law principle of male preference primogeniture. On the death of a monarch, the throne has normally passed to their eldest and nearest male relative (usually a son), and the line of succession has been constructed accordingly.

Under s 1 of the 2013 Act, succession to the Crown is no longer dependent on gender. In the case of persons born after 28 October 2011, their place in the line of succession depends solely on when they were born. In practice, of course, the new succession arrangements are unlikely to have much effect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll