header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010 / John Furber KC
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Gathering the Harvest

John Furber QC revisits authorised guarantee agreements

The decision of Newey J in Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) is of practical importance to investors in commercial property. Where such property is let, its value is primarily determined by reference to the rent payable under the lease and the strength of the covenants ensuring payment of that rent. The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 provides for the release of such covenants in certain circumstances and may also have effect so that some covenants, albeit freely entered into, may be void from the start. The Good Harvest case is concerned with the scope of these provisions. When it was last considered in this journal, an appeal was pending; that appeal has not been pursued, following a settlement, and the consequences of the decision should now be given further consideration (NLJ, 4 June 2010, p 791).

The difficulties and uncertainties relate to covenants given by guarantors. The position as to covenants given by a tenant is simple enough;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll