header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010 / John Furber KC
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Gathering the Harvest

John Furber QC revisits authorised guarantee agreements

The decision of Newey J in Good Harvest Partnership LLP v Centaur Services Ltd [2010] EWHC 330 (Ch) is of practical importance to investors in commercial property. Where such property is let, its value is primarily determined by reference to the rent payable under the lease and the strength of the covenants ensuring payment of that rent. The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 provides for the release of such covenants in certain circumstances and may also have effect so that some covenants, albeit freely entered into, may be void from the start. The Good Harvest case is concerned with the scope of these provisions. When it was last considered in this journal, an appeal was pending; that appeal has not been pursued, following a settlement, and the consequences of the decision should now be given further consideration (NLJ, 4 June 2010, p 791).

The difficulties and uncertainties relate to covenants given by guarantors. The position as to covenants given by a tenant is simple enough;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll