header-logo header-logo

Gauke pledges support for crime victims

12 September 2018
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lord Chancellor promises review of a system no longer ‘fit for purpose’

The government has announced an overhaul of its support for victims of crime, including a major review of the criminal injuries compensation scheme (CICS) and greater support for bereaved families.

Publishing the cross-departmental Victims Strategy paper this week, Justice Secretary David Gauke said it set out ‘the support victims should receive at every stage of their journey through the justice system’. The government will launch a consultation on the plans early next year.

A review of the CICS will begin immediately, considering reform of the time limits for applying and abolition of the ‘unfair and arbitrary’ pre-1979 ‘same roof rule’ under which victims cannot claim if they lived with the perpetrator.

Katie Russell, spokesperson at Rape Crisis England & Wales, said the review was ‘long overdue’ as ‘the current scheme is not fit for purpose and discriminates in particular against victims and survivors of sexual offences’.

Russell said it was encouraging that the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse would be taken into account. She highlighted other issues including the failure to recognise that under-16s cannot consent to their own abuse through the distinction drawn between consent in law and ‘in fact’, the two-year time limit, and the disqualification of victims and survivors with criminal convictions.

Gauke pledged to toughen up enforcement of the Victim’s Code, which sets out the minimum level of service that victims should receive from the justice system, and to introduce victim-friendly waiting areas in court and improve accessibility for the most vulnerable. Local authorities will be supported so that ‘no victim is turned away’ from a refuge.

Court time in the magistrates’ court would be freed up by dealing with crimes with no identifiable victims, such as fare-dodging, outside of court hearings. Vulnerable victims would continue to be able to give evidence through video link.

The government also launched a consultation this week on ‘Establishing an independent public advocate’, who would act for bereaved families after a public disaster such as Hillsborough and support them with any subsequent inquests and inquiries. The consultation ends on 3 December 2018.

Issue: 7808 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll