header-logo header-logo

12 September 2018
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Gauke pledges support for crime victims

Lord Chancellor promises review of a system no longer ‘fit for purpose’

The government has announced an overhaul of its support for victims of crime, including a major review of the criminal injuries compensation scheme (CICS) and greater support for bereaved families.

Publishing the cross-departmental Victims Strategy paper this week, Justice Secretary David Gauke said it set out ‘the support victims should receive at every stage of their journey through the justice system’. The government will launch a consultation on the plans early next year.

A review of the CICS will begin immediately, considering reform of the time limits for applying and abolition of the ‘unfair and arbitrary’ pre-1979 ‘same roof rule’ under which victims cannot claim if they lived with the perpetrator.

Katie Russell, spokesperson at Rape Crisis England & Wales, said the review was ‘long overdue’ as ‘the current scheme is not fit for purpose and discriminates in particular against victims and survivors of sexual offences’.

Russell said it was encouraging that the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse would be taken into account. She highlighted other issues including the failure to recognise that under-16s cannot consent to their own abuse through the distinction drawn between consent in law and ‘in fact’, the two-year time limit, and the disqualification of victims and survivors with criminal convictions.

Gauke pledged to toughen up enforcement of the Victim’s Code, which sets out the minimum level of service that victims should receive from the justice system, and to introduce victim-friendly waiting areas in court and improve accessibility for the most vulnerable. Local authorities will be supported so that ‘no victim is turned away’ from a refuge.

Court time in the magistrates’ court would be freed up by dealing with crimes with no identifiable victims, such as fare-dodging, outside of court hearings. Vulnerable victims would continue to be able to give evidence through video link.

The government also launched a consultation this week on ‘Establishing an independent public advocate’, who would act for bereaved families after a public disaster such as Hillsborough and support them with any subsequent inquests and inquiries. The consultation ends on 3 December 2018.

Issue: 7808 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll