header-logo header-logo

Gender & the law: time for change

12 July 2024 / Jasmine Galvin
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
181431
From pronouns to ‘legalease’—the legal world needs to adapt, argues Jasmine Galvin
  • Considers how the legal profession should respond to gender issues, particularly how family lawyers can be inclusive and supportive.

It is now 20 years since the creation of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and ten years on from the legalisation of gay marriage in the UK. This country is clearly capable of change and shows positive signs of becoming more inclusive.

Census 2021, England and Wales included a question on gender identity for the first time, with the result showing more than 260,000 people reported their gender identity as different to their sex registered at birth. So should the family justice system be better equipped to accommodate gender diversity? Is there a need for legal practitioners to adapt some of our historic legislation to enable everyone to feel they can access legal services without barriers—and, as non-binary/LGBTQIA+ communities continue to grow, are we able to make these changes to ensure inclusivity?

Pronouns

What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll