header-logo header-logo

27 April 2017 / David Greene
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The general election: an unwelcome interlude?

nlj_7744_greene

Civil justice reforms are likely to be knocked back in the wake of the June election, says David Greene

I joined our American colleagues at the ABA International Law Section Spring Conference in DC last week to talk about Brexit. When I agreed to do so we were in the throes of the Art 50 litigation and all was Brexit. It may be just an interlude in the Brexit chatter but we have swiftly moved into election mode with Theresa May seeking to consolidate her position for the Brexit negotiations. The date chosen is an auspicious one for it falls on my birthday. So just as the dust was settling it gets stirred again. Plus ça change. But what might we expect in law and civil justice from the election?

Counting casualties

The first ‘casualty’ of the election was the Prisons and Courts Bill which has not been included in the ‘wash up’ before the dissolution of Parliament on 3 May. The Bill was introduced by Michael Gove

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll