header-logo header-logo

27 April 2017 / David Greene
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The general election: an unwelcome interlude?

nlj_7744_greene

Civil justice reforms are likely to be knocked back in the wake of the June election, says David Greene

I joined our American colleagues at the ABA International Law Section Spring Conference in DC last week to talk about Brexit. When I agreed to do so we were in the throes of the Art 50 litigation and all was Brexit. It may be just an interlude in the Brexit chatter but we have swiftly moved into election mode with Theresa May seeking to consolidate her position for the Brexit negotiations. The date chosen is an auspicious one for it falls on my birthday. So just as the dust was settling it gets stirred again. Plus ça change. But what might we expect in law and civil justice from the election?

Counting casualties

The first ‘casualty’ of the election was the Prisons and Courts Bill which has not been included in the ‘wash up’ before the dissolution of Parliament on 3 May. The Bill was introduced by Michael Gove

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll