header-logo header-logo

27 April 2017 / David Greene
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The general election: an unwelcome interlude?

nlj_7744_greene

Civil justice reforms are likely to be knocked back in the wake of the June election, says David Greene

I joined our American colleagues at the ABA International Law Section Spring Conference in DC last week to talk about Brexit. When I agreed to do so we were in the throes of the Art 50 litigation and all was Brexit. It may be just an interlude in the Brexit chatter but we have swiftly moved into election mode with Theresa May seeking to consolidate her position for the Brexit negotiations. The date chosen is an auspicious one for it falls on my birthday. So just as the dust was settling it gets stirred again. Plus ça change. But what might we expect in law and civil justice from the election?

Counting casualties

The first ‘casualty’ of the election was the Prisons and Courts Bill which has not been included in the ‘wash up’ before the dissolution of Parliament on 3 May. The Bill was introduced by Michael Gove

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll