header-logo header-logo

01 September 2020 / Amandeep Khasriya
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Features , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Getting equal: more work to be done

26327

In brief

  • Inequality rooted in bias.
  • A commitment to transparency.
  • Building a more equal society.

While we may be celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act this year, it is vital we now look to the future and understand the need for change. The legal profession needs action, not promises.

In May 1970, the Equal Pay Act gained Royal Assent following a women’s strike in a Dagenham factory. This was a landmark moment in the history of women’s rights, enshrining in law that men and women in the same job are to be treated equally, in terms of pay and the conditions of their work.

While there has been tremendous progress, it is important that the legal industry recognises how much more work there is to be done for true equality to be realised. Women have waited long enough for equal pay and, without proper change, it will take decades to close the pay gap.

This starts with transparency. Equal pay—as set out in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll