header-logo header-logo

21 May 2015 / Dale Timson
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Getting our priorities right

nlj_7653_timson

Does the legal profession prioritise access to justice for all, asks Dale Timson

Access to justice fundamentally underpins the rule of law and serves as a vital weapon in the armoury of those seeking to uphold their legal rights. Its importance can be seen from legislation such as the Legal Services Act 2007 which introduced a regulatory objective of “improving access to justice”. As such, it is the duty of the profession to uphold it.

Pro bono

Against the backdrop of cuts in legal aid and local authority spending on legal advice, the profession attempts to facilitate access to justice; most notably through pro bono work which assists many individuals who would, without it, ultimately, be deprived of access to justice. Organisations such as the Free Representation Unit, the Bar Pro Bono Unit, Law Centres and university legal advice clinics, enable lawyers to carry out a vast amount of pro bono work which goes a long way in facilitating access to justice. In addition to this, the passion of the profession

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll