header-logo header-logo

21 August 2023
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gherson Solicitors—Kamilla Kelemen

Firm welcomes back head of UK inbound immigration

Gherson Solicitors LLP has announced that Kamilla Kelemen has joined the firm as head of the firm’s UK inbound immigration practice.

Kamilla trained and qualified at Gherson and she has re-joined the firm after four years with Magrath Sheldrick LLP. Kamilla has extensive knowledge of corporate and general immigration, as well British nationality law. She has extensive experience advising corporations and individuals across a wide range of practice areas.

Kamilla will add her unique expertise to an already-strong team of dedicated lawyers, who have helped countless businesses and families to navigate the ever-changing and highly politicised landscape of UK immigration law.

Commenting on Kamilla Kelemen’s re-appointment, Roger Gherson, founding partner at Gherson Solicitors LLP, said: 'It is fantastic to have Kamilla re-join the practice. Kamilla has exactly the right profile and skill set to lead our corporate and general immigration team, and to build on and expand the high-quality work for which we are known. Kamilla is a wonderful addition at a really exciting time for this firm and for immigration law generally.'

Kamilla Kelemen added: 'I am delighted to be returning to Gherson Solicitors. It’s great to be back and to re-connect with old colleagues and friends.  I am really looking forward to getting stuck into running the UK inbound immigration practice at Gherson at such an exciting time for UK immigration law.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll