header-logo header-logo

27 March 2026
Issue: 8155 / Categories: Legal News , Court of Protection
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations

245634
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 

In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer, consultant at Wedlake Bell, considers the recent case of Enable & Thrive Ltd v The Public Guardian [2026] EWCOP 11.

While trust corporations have some benefits, for example, continuity as corporations never go on holiday, fall sick or retire, it is obviously important that safeguards and oversight applies, for example, the regulatory oversight of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The case of Enable & Thrive concerns the appointment for the first time of a category 3 trust corporation—not subject to SRA oversight, as opposed to category 1 and category 2 where the trust corporation itself and individuals within the trust but not the trust itself, respectively, are regulated by the SRA.

Stanyer writes: ‘The court was right to express caution and require specific detailed undertakings to reassure the Public Guardian and the public that this category of trust corporation could be appointed as deputy.’ 

Issue: 8155 / Categories: Legal News , Court of Protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll