header-logo header-logo

Gibson on costs

04 February 2022 / William Gibson
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
71169
William Gibson recounts some heated moments from the world of costs

In the olden days, when London was swinging, Beatles were singing and Hippies strode the earth, detailed assessments were called taxations and took place in the Supreme Court Taxing Office (SCTO), tucked away among endless corridors in the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ). The SCTO was operated under the auspices of the Lord Chancellor’s Department, not the Civil Service as now. The Taxing Masters had individual chambers and were supported by four clerks of varying ranks, the lowest being the third-class clerk who manned (no women then) the outer office.

Those were the days before airport-type security so it was not difficult for potentially dangerous objects to be brought in.

One such weapon was an umbrella. One regular visitor to one outer office was a litigant in person who felt he had been badly treated so demanded to see the Lord Chancellor, as he thought ‘the Boss’ was the only person capable of understanding and solving his problem. He was always

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll