header-logo header-logo

Gibson on costs

04 February 2022 / William Gibson
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
71169
William Gibson recounts some heated moments from the world of costs

In the olden days, when London was swinging, Beatles were singing and Hippies strode the earth, detailed assessments were called taxations and took place in the Supreme Court Taxing Office (SCTO), tucked away among endless corridors in the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ). The SCTO was operated under the auspices of the Lord Chancellor’s Department, not the Civil Service as now. The Taxing Masters had individual chambers and were supported by four clerks of varying ranks, the lowest being the third-class clerk who manned (no women then) the outer office.

Those were the days before airport-type security so it was not difficult for potentially dangerous objects to be brought in.

One such weapon was an umbrella. One regular visitor to one outer office was a litigant in person who felt he had been badly treated so demanded to see the Lord Chancellor, as he thought ‘the Boss’ was the only person capable of understanding and solving his problem. He was always

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll