header-logo header-logo

​Give & take

10 March 2016 / Joyce Bradbeer
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Opinion , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7690_bradbeer

Personal representatives will struggle to fund the proposed increase in probate court fees, says Joyce Bradbeer

Government proposals to make probate fees “fairer” by moving from a flat to a banded fee approach, proportionate to, and rising with, the value of the estate, are out for consultation and provoking debate. The new regime will also increase the value of the estate below which no fee is payable from £5,000 to £50,000.

I believe the banded fee approach is particularly unfair as the work at the probate registry to issue the grant is the same whether the value of the estate is £500,000 or £2m. The government consultation paper actually admits that the money raised from probate registry fees already covers their costs. This can only therefore be seen as a tax on the wealthy designed to fund HM Courts & Tribunals Service in general. How are these fees to be raised in a world where it is already increasingly difficult for personal representatives to fund the funeral costs and inheritance tax due on the application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll