header-logo header-logo

10 March 2016 / Joyce Bradbeer
Issue: 7690 / Categories: Opinion , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

​Give & take

001_nlj_7690_bradbeer

Personal representatives will struggle to fund the proposed increase in probate court fees, says Joyce Bradbeer

Government proposals to make probate fees “fairer” by moving from a flat to a banded fee approach, proportionate to, and rising with, the value of the estate, are out for consultation and provoking debate. The new regime will also increase the value of the estate below which no fee is payable from £5,000 to £50,000.

I believe the banded fee approach is particularly unfair as the work at the probate registry to issue the grant is the same whether the value of the estate is £500,000 or £2m. The government consultation paper actually admits that the money raised from probate registry fees already covers their costs. This can only therefore be seen as a tax on the wealthy designed to fund HM Courts & Tribunals Service in general. How are these fees to be raised in a world where it is already increasingly difficult for personal representatives to fund the funeral costs and inheritance tax due on the application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll