header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Alan Waller
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Local government , Profession , Environment
printer mail-detail

Going green

Alan Waller offers some tips on how to reduce the risk of inaccurate carbon reporting

Until now, emissions’ reporting has been a voluntary process for most organisations, as part of their corporate social responsibility programmes. In April 2010, the UK’s Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) scheme switched carbon reporting to a legally mandatory requirement for approximately 5,000 UK companies. Those companies included in the scheme will be required to pay in advance for their energy-related carbon emissions, and although most of this payment will be recycled to participants there will be stringent penalties for the failure to accurately report on energy use. 

The quality, accuracy and frequency of emissions data gathering will continue to increase. Until recently, energy use and carbon emissions were often only calculated once a year for the annual report, or quarterly at most. To stay ahead of the new compliance environment and manage reductions, data will need to be gathered more frequently – particularly for those organisations using half hourly metering. The effect that this has on the volume of data

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll