header-logo header-logo

Going live!

22 July 2010 / Robbie Constance , Hans Allnutt
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Robbie Constance & Hans Allnutt explain the new Ombudsman Scheme & analyse recent regulatory risks

The Legal Services Act 2007 (the Act) created the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC) to administer a new scheme to deal with consumer complaints about legal services. The proposed Legal Ombudsman Scheme rules have been published with the expectation that the scheme will “go live” in October 2010.
Having handled complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), on whose rules the Legal Ombudsman Scheme is based, since it was created, we can speculate on the key issues likely to arise.

Jurisdiction
 

A complainant must be an individual, or fall into one of the following categories: certain small charities, clubs and associations; trustees; personal representatives; and residuary beneficiaries. In addition, small businesses (known in the relevant EU regulations as “micro-enterprises”—with fewer than 10 staff and a balance sheet of less than €2m) can complain. Because the service is free to the complainant and informal, the award of costs is “likely to be rare”
(r 5.39).

The complaint must only relate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll