header-logo header-logo

Going live!

22 July 2010 / Robbie Constance , Hans Allnutt
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Robbie Constance & Hans Allnutt explain the new Ombudsman Scheme & analyse recent regulatory risks

The Legal Services Act 2007 (the Act) created the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC) to administer a new scheme to deal with consumer complaints about legal services. The proposed Legal Ombudsman Scheme rules have been published with the expectation that the scheme will “go live” in October 2010.
Having handled complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), on whose rules the Legal Ombudsman Scheme is based, since it was created, we can speculate on the key issues likely to arise.

Jurisdiction
 

A complainant must be an individual, or fall into one of the following categories: certain small charities, clubs and associations; trustees; personal representatives; and residuary beneficiaries. In addition, small businesses (known in the relevant EU regulations as “micro-enterprises”—with fewer than 10 staff and a balance sheet of less than €2m) can complain. Because the service is free to the complainant and informal, the award of costs is “likely to be rare”
(r 5.39).

The complaint must only relate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll