header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010 / Robbie Constance , Hans Allnutt
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Going live!

Robbie Constance & Hans Allnutt explain the new Ombudsman Scheme & analyse recent regulatory risks

The Legal Services Act 2007 (the Act) created the Office for Legal Complaints (OLC) to administer a new scheme to deal with consumer complaints about legal services. The proposed Legal Ombudsman Scheme rules have been published with the expectation that the scheme will “go live” in October 2010.
Having handled complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), on whose rules the Legal Ombudsman Scheme is based, since it was created, we can speculate on the key issues likely to arise.

Jurisdiction
 

A complainant must be an individual, or fall into one of the following categories: certain small charities, clubs and associations; trustees; personal representatives; and residuary beneficiaries. In addition, small businesses (known in the relevant EU regulations as “micro-enterprises”—with fewer than 10 staff and a balance sheet of less than €2m) can complain. Because the service is free to the complainant and informal, the award of costs is “likely to be rare”
(r 5.39).

The complaint must only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll