header-logo header-logo

20 February 2020 / Shofiq Miah
Issue: 7875 / Categories: Features , Tax , Property
printer mail-detail

Going off plan: a welcome relief?

16315
Relief from capital gains tax: at what point do you own your home, asks Shofiq Miah
  • The recent Court of Appeal decision in Higgins v Commissioners for HMRC brings a welcome correction to what looked like a wrong turning taken by the Upper Tribunal.

The case of Higgins v Commissioners for HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1860, [2019] All ER (D) 25 (Nov) concerned what is often called ‘principal private residence relief’ in ss 222-223 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992). The relief is targeted at relieving a capital gains tax (CGT) charge when an individual sells his main or only residence at a gain.

Technical conditions have to be satisfied in order for the relief to apply but for present purposes the focus is that the relief applies in full if the taxpayer has occupied the property as his main or only residence for the whole of his period of ownership. If, by contrast, the property is occupied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll