header-logo header-logo

20 February 2020 / Shofiq Miah
Issue: 7875 / Categories: Features , Tax , Property
printer mail-detail

Going off plan: a welcome relief?

16315
Relief from capital gains tax: at what point do you own your home, asks Shofiq Miah
  • The recent Court of Appeal decision in Higgins v Commissioners for HMRC brings a welcome correction to what looked like a wrong turning taken by the Upper Tribunal.

The case of Higgins v Commissioners for HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1860, [2019] All ER (D) 25 (Nov) concerned what is often called ‘principal private residence relief’ in ss 222-223 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992). The relief is targeted at relieving a capital gains tax (CGT) charge when an individual sells his main or only residence at a gain.

Technical conditions have to be satisfied in order for the relief to apply but for present purposes the focus is that the relief applies in full if the taxpayer has occupied the property as his main or only residence for the whole of his period of ownership. If, by contrast, the property is occupied

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll