header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Francesca Richmond
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Going stateside

When can individuals be extradited for pre-2003 cartel offences? Francesca Richmond reports

The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Norris v Government of the United States of America and others [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] All ER (D) 158 (Mar) has made clear that individuals can be extradited to the US for involvement in price-fixing activities that occurred prior to June 2003 and the implementation of the statutory criminal cartel offence under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002). Extradition on this basis will only be granted where some aggravating feature, such as dishonesty, is also alleged against the individual because agreements to fix prices have not historically been treated as dishonest in themselves (and so entering into such an agreement and/or failing to declare participation in a cartel alone cannot be treated as an indictable criminal offence prior to 2003).

 

EXTRADITION ACT

The Extradition Act 2003 requires that the offending conduct cited by any state requesting extradition must be criminal in and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll