header-logo header-logo

Going stateside

10 April 2008 / Francesca Richmond
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

When can individuals be extradited for pre-2003 cartel offences? Francesca Richmond reports

The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Norris v Government of the United States of America and others [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] All ER (D) 158 (Mar) has made clear that individuals can be extradited to the US for involvement in price-fixing activities that occurred prior to June 2003 and the implementation of the statutory criminal cartel offence under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002). Extradition on this basis will only be granted where some aggravating feature, such as dishonesty, is also alleged against the individual because agreements to fix prices have not historically been treated as dishonest in themselves (and so entering into such an agreement and/or failing to declare participation in a cartel alone cannot be treated as an indictable criminal offence prior to 2003).

 

EXTRADITION ACT

The Extradition Act 2003 requires that the offending conduct cited by any state requesting extradition must be criminal in and and also the state

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll