header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008 / Francesca Richmond
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Going stateside

When can individuals be extradited for pre-2003 cartel offences? Francesca Richmond reports

The recent judgment of the House of Lords in Norris v Government of the United States of America and others [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] All ER (D) 158 (Mar) has made clear that individuals can be extradited to the US for involvement in price-fixing activities that occurred prior to June 2003 and the implementation of the statutory criminal cartel offence under s 188 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002). Extradition on this basis will only be granted where some aggravating feature, such as dishonesty, is also alleged against the individual because agreements to fix prices have not historically been treated as dishonest in themselves (and so entering into such an agreement and/or failing to declare participation in a cartel alone cannot be treated as an indictable criminal offence prior to 2003).

 

EXTRADITION ACT

The Extradition Act 2003 requires that the offending conduct cited by any state requesting extradition must be criminal in and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

NLJ Career Profile: Jasmine Olomolaiye, Foot Anstey

Jasmine Olomolaiye, partner at national law firm Foot Anstey, discusses the power of reading and the dizzying heights of her dream career

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Freeths—Christopher Stephens

Strategic land specialist joins real estate practice as partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Pawlowski

Construction practice strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll