header-logo header-logo

The Golden Rule

19 February 2009 / David Catchpole
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Wills & Probate , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

If your client’s mental capacity is in doubt, how do you best advise them? David Catchpole explains

There is a good degree of knowledge in the legal profession about the so called golden but tactless rule where the capacity of a testator may be in issue. However, while the vast majority of probate practitioners are aware of the rule, fewer appear to follow it in practice. Telling your client, who you may have represented for numerous years, that you have concerns about their mental faculties is never easy—and many solicitors will shy away from this very difficult conversation. It is a conversation that may well lose a client (and potential fee income) as a result. Further, some practitioners may feel it is better to prepare a will and risk a fight in future over capacity, than to refuse to prepare a will and risk a possible professional negligence claim for not following their client’s instructions. Will preparation is a competitive business and a solicitor refusing to prepare a will for a  client whose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll