header-logo header-logo

Good governance

09 December 2010 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

In the first of two articles, Jane Mayfield considers the rationale behind the IoD’s new corporate governance framework

The Institute of Directors (IoD) issued its guidance on corporate governance, Corporate Governance Guidance and Principles for Unlisted Companies in the UK, last month. The guidance is based on the document published by the European Confederation of Directors’ Association in March, Corporate Governance Guidance and Principles for Unlisted Companies in Europe. 
Aimed at directors, shareholders and stakeholders of unlisted UK companies the guidance provides the IoD’s rationale and reasons for establishing an effective corporate governance framework in an unlisted company (Part One) and 14 governance principles (Part Two).

The rationale for the guidance

Historically corporate governance codes in the UK have focused on listed companies. With increasing media and public attention in this area over the last few years, and the economic importance of unlisted companies, the IoD has published a set of voluntary corporate governance principles outlining best practice for unlisted companies. The guidance focuses on limited companies that are not listed or quoted on a public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll