header-logo header-logo

09 December 2010 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7445 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Good governance

In the first of two articles, Jane Mayfield considers the rationale behind the IoD’s new corporate governance framework

The Institute of Directors (IoD) issued its guidance on corporate governance, Corporate Governance Guidance and Principles for Unlisted Companies in the UK, last month. The guidance is based on the document published by the European Confederation of Directors’ Association in March, Corporate Governance Guidance and Principles for Unlisted Companies in Europe. 
Aimed at directors, shareholders and stakeholders of unlisted UK companies the guidance provides the IoD’s rationale and reasons for establishing an effective corporate governance framework in an unlisted company (Part One) and 14 governance principles (Part Two).

The rationale for the guidance

Historically corporate governance codes in the UK have focused on listed companies. With increasing media and public attention in this area over the last few years, and the economic importance of unlisted companies, the IoD has published a set of voluntary corporate governance principles outlining best practice for unlisted companies. The guidance focuses on limited companies that are not listed or quoted on a public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll